Tech Log inEmailPassword Remember meYour login is case sensitive
I have forgotten my password
Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens logincloseMy New ScientistHomeNewsIn-Depth ArticlesBlogsOpinionTVGalleriesTopic GuidesLast WordSubscribeDatingLook for Science JobsSPACETECHENVIRONMENTHEALTHLIFEPHYSICS&MATHSCIENCE IN SOCIETYCookies & PrivacyHome|Tech|News
FBI launches $1 billion face recognition project07 September 2012 bySara ReardonMagazine issue 2880. Subscribe and saveFor similar stories, visit theCrime and ForensicsTopic GuideThe Next Generation Identification programme will include a nationwide database of criminal faces and other biometrics
"FACE recognition is 'now'," declared Alessandro Acquisti of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh in a testimony before the US Senate in July. It certainly seems that way. As part of an update to the national fingerprint database, the FBI has begun rolling out facial recognition to identify criminals. It will form part of the bureau's long-awaited, $1 billion Next Generation Identification (NGI) programme, which will also add biometrics such as iris scans, DNA analysis and voice identification to the toolkit. A handful of states began uploading their photos as part of a pilot programme this February and it is expected to be rolled out nationwide by 2014. In addition to scanning mugshots for a match, FBI officials have indicated that they are keen to track a suspect by picking out their face in a crowd. Another application would be the reverse: images of a person of interest from security cameras or public photos uploaded onto the internet could be compared against a national repository of images held by the FBI. An algorithm would perform an automatic search and return a list of potential hits for an officer to sort through and use as possible leads for an investigation. Ideally, such technological advancements will allow law enforcement to identify criminals more accurately and lead to quicker arrests. But privacy advocates are worried by the broad scope of the FBI's plans. They are concerned that people with no criminal record who are caught on camera alongside a person of interest could end up in a federal database, or be subject to unwarranted surveillance. The FBI's Jerome Pender told the Senate in July that the searchable photo database used in the pilot studies only includes mugshots of known criminals. But it's unclear from the NGI's privacy statement whether that will remain the case once the entire system is up and running or if civilian photos might be added, says attorney Jennifer Lynch of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The FBI was unable to answer New Scientist's questions before the magazine went to press. The FBI hasn't shared details of the algorithms it is using, but its technology could be very accurate if applied to photographs taken in controlled situations such as passport photos or police shots. Tests in 2010 showed that the best algorithms can pick someone out in a pool of 1.6 million mugshots 92 per cent of the time. It's possible to match a mugshot to a photo of a person who isn't looking at the camera too. Algorithms such as one developed by Marios Savvides's lab at Carnegie Mellon can analyse features of a front and side view set of mugshots, create a 3D model of the face, rotate it as much as 70 degrees to match the angle of the face in the photo, and then match the new 2D image with a fairly high degree of accuracy. The most difficult faces to match are those in low light. Merging photos from visible and infrared spectra can sharpen these images, but infrared cameras are still very expensive. Of course, it is easier to match up posed images and the FBI has already partnered with issuers of state drivers' licences for photo comparison. Jay Stanley of the American Civil Liberties Union urges caution: "Once you start plugging this into the FBI database, it becomes tantamount to a national photographic database."
Subscribe to New Scientist and you'll get:New Scientist magazine delivered every weekUnlimited access to all New Scientist online content - a benefit only available to subscribersGreat savings from the normal priceSubscribe now!
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.Have your sayOnly subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.
email:password:Remember meOnly personal subscribers may leave comments on this article
Subscribe now to comment.
Private Prisons And War On DrugsFri Aug 31 03:16:47 BST 2012 by ullrich fischerGiven that current technologies are already aiding in the incarceration of more Americans than residents of any other country in the world, even including China, this technology will just add to the problem. As long as the clearly failed war on drugs continues and as long as there are for-profit prisons, there will be more people guilty of non-violent "crimes" ground up by the criminal "justice" system to the detriment of all Americans in terms of lost productivity and the tax burden increase as more tax money is shoveled into the profits of the prison "industry". It seems pretty clear that the only reason the war on drugs continues is the corrupting influence of drug gang and prison profit money. Every single person who has studied the effects of the war on drugs with even the remotest whiff of scientific rigor has concluded that the cons far outweigh the pros. The analogy with prohibition of alcohol alone is pretty overwhelming evidence that the current war on drugs is counterproductive.
login and replyreport this commentAll comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.
Mugshots are just the start (Image: Timothy Fadek/Corbis)ADVERTISEMENTMoreLatest newsUp, up and away: Chimeric bicycles take to the skies
10:03 07 September 2012Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's the start of a new extreme sport – pedal-powered flying
AI cyber-fighter: does it feel human, punk?
11:21 06 September 2012A software bot designed to act human by mimicking consciousness is poised to go into battle in the Unreal Tournament arena
Tough, super-stretchy gel could make better implants
10:30 06 September 2012A new water-based gel is one of the stretchiest materials yet made, and it is durable enough to offer hope for better medical implants
Obama's 2025 car fuel efficiency goals are already in reach
11:56 05 September 2012By 2025, all US cars must achieve 54.5 miles per gallon. Sounds tough, but much of the technology needed already exists
see all related stories
MoreLatest newsUp, up and away: Chimeric bicycles take to the skies10:03 07 September 2012Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's the start of a new extreme sport – pedal-powered flying
Astrophile: Lucky strike turns a dark cloud into a star
18:57 06 September 2012A "bullet" is hitting the inky cloud Barnard 68, which means it could offer one of the best views yet of the earliest stage of star formation
Acupuncture treatment is not as safe as advertised
18:44 06 September 2012The author of the first study into the side effects of acupuncture says the findings suggest the risks may outweigh any benefits
Battle of the blades: tech of the Paralympic 100-metre final18:15 06 September 2012Tonight's Paralympic men's 100-metre final will pit Oscar Pistorius against Alan Oliveira, who beat him in the controversial 200-metre final - sparks may fly
see all latest news
Most readMost commented Evolution could explain the placebo effect Hail Jeremy Hunt, the new minister for magic Silent Spring didn't condemn millions to death The ever deepening mystery of the human genome Voyager 1: reports of my exit are greatly exaggerated Most readMost commented Organic food: no better for you, or the planet Hail Jeremy Hunt, the new minister for magic If 2013 breaks heat record, how will deniers respond? Can we live without free will? Could we geoengineer the climate with CO2? TWITTERNew Scientist is on Twitter
Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed
LATEST JOBS AstraZeneca US: Controls Engineer/Sr. Controls Engineer AstraZeneca US: Pharmaceutical Sales Specialist - EQ PC1 - Zanesville, OH AstraZeneca US: Pharmaceutical Sales Specialist - PM PT1 - York, PA AstraZeneca US: Pharmaceutical Sales Specialist - CC PCOV1 - Union, NJ AstraZeneca US: Pharmaceutical Sales Specialist - MM DOV1 - Anchorage, AK This week's issueSubscribe
For exclusive news and expert analysis, subscribe to New Scientist.
Gain full online accessCurrent issue contentContent of past issues08 September 2012ADVERTISEMENTBack to topLoginEmailPassword Remember meYour login is case sensitive
I have forgotten my password
Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens logincloseAbout usNew ScientistSyndicationRecruitment AdvertisingStaff at New ScientistAdvertiseRBI JobsUser HelpContact UsFAQ / HelpDisclaimerTs & CsCookiesPrivacy PolicySubscriptionsSubscribeRenewGift subscriptionMy accountBack issuesCustomer ServiceLinksSite MapBrowse all articlesMagazine archiveNewScientistJobsThe LastWordRSS FeedsOnline StoreAndroid AppMobile site homeScience JobsBiology JobsChemistry JobsClinical JobsSales JobsEarth & Environment JobsEngineering JobsMaths & IT JobsGraduate Jobs© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.
No comments:
Post a Comment