Showing posts with label Amazons. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Amazons. Show all posts

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Amazon's new Kindle Fire tablets: 4 things to know before you buy

Amazon on Thursday proved its ready to battle Apple and Google for tablet domination with a new family of Kindle Fire HD tablets. The new tablets come with a variety of new features including fast data transfer rates, high definition displays, pretty good pricing, and one device even comes with LTE connectivity to keep you connected on the go.

The company is debuting three brand new Fire tablets: the 7-inch Fire HD, Fire HD 8.9 inch and the Fire HD 8.9 inch with 4G LTE wireless ranging in price from $199 to $599 depending on the storage and connectivity options you choose. Amazon also added some upgrades to the original Kindle Fire and priced it at $159. For a complete breakdown of all the new Fire tablets check out “ How the new Kindle Fires impact the tablet landscape .”

Amazon's new tablets look great, but what are some of the more notable features you might want to know about before buying? Here's a look at five things that come to mind.

Rumblings about ads on the Kindle Fire first surfaced in May, and the rumors turned out to be true for Amazon's new Kindle Fire tablets. The devices will come with advertising on the lock screen and this time there's apparently no escaping them.

Special offers will include deals such as discounts for Amazon digital goods, and third-party advertising from companies such as AT&T, Discover, and Intel. Amazon first introduced special offers in May 2011 when it launched an ad-supported Kindle e-reader. Unlike Amazon's e-readers, however, you won't be able to pay extra to have the special offers removed from your tablet. If you own a new Kindle Fire, you'll be getting ads on your lock screen.

The Fire tablets are built on Android, but Amazon tries to hide its device's Android underpinnings with the company's own user interface. The company has reportedly said that the two newer tablets, the 7- and 8.9-inch Kindle Fire HD tablets, are running Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, according to Engadget. Amazon was unavailable for comment at the time of this writing.

Critics are raving about the AT&T LTE data package you can get with Amazon's $500 8.9-inch Kindle Fire HD, but is it really that good? For $50 you get one year of LTE data with a 250MB monthly cap, which works out to about $0.016 cents per megabyte. That's a huge value compared to AT&T's iPad cellular data plan, which costs $15 per month for 250MB, nearly $0.06 per MB. Verizon gets much closer to Amazon's prices with its lowest iPad LTE plan of 1GB per month for $20, about $0.019 per MB.

The problem is that 250MB of cellular data will likely serve only the most casual of data users looking for web browsing and e-mail usage while on the go. If you want more data you can upgrade to 3GB or 5GB data plans from AT&T. Assuming AT&T keeps the pricing the same as with the iPad, you will pay $30 per month for 3GB or $50 per month 5GB.

In addition to LTE data, Amazon's $50 annual charge gets you 20GB of cloud storage via Amazon Cloud Drive and a $10 Appstore for Android credit.

Amazon is bringing its Whispersync technology to audiobooks and games. Whispersync is the technology that allows you to read a Kindle book on your iPhone while on the subway and then pick-up right where you left off at home using your Kindle e-reader. That syncing technology is now available for Amazon's audiobooks and Appstore games. But, as Jared Newman pointed out earlier, it's unclear if the new Whispersync for audio and games works across non-Amazon devices such as a Samsung Android phone with the Appstore installed.

Posting comment ...


View the original article here

Monday, September 10, 2012

How Amazon's latest e-readers measure up

Amazon had many devices to dangle in front of the press’s eyes at Thursday’s special press event, but first off the line was the next generation of the company’s popular Kindle e-reader.

The Kindle Paperwhite won’t be out until October 1, so we’ll have to wait until then to see how the device’s speed and functionality match up with its competition; if you’re looking for a new e-reader, however, here’s how the new Kindles stack up—specs-wise—against others in their class.

One thing to note before going forward: The Kindle only supports the .AZW and .MOBI formats (the Kindle Paperwhite also supports Kindle Format 8), which are proprietary to Amazon. This means that you can’t buy a book on the iBookstore or from the Nook store and read it on your Kindle—at least, not without some fancy conversion on your computer first.

It’s rather telling when you introduce a device on price alone, but that’s just what Amazon decided to do with the $69 Kindle. The new device is, by all outward appearances, nearly identical to last year’s $79 Kindle, save for that $10 drop in price. That price makes it the cheapest e-reader currently on the market, though it’s worth noting that $69 gets you an ad-supported Kindle—you’ll have to pay another $20 if you want your device ad-free. It’ll be out on September 14, though you can pre-order now.

The low price comes at a minor cost to Amazon: Unlike its brethren, this Kindle has no touchscreen and can only download books over Wi-Fi.

Barnes and Noble’s $99 Nook Simple Touch, currently shipping, has the most parity in features to the $69/$89 Kindle, as it also sports a black-and-white 6-inch e-ink screen and Wi-Fi-only downloads. The Simple Touch, however, provides both hardware page-turn buttons and full touchscreen sensitivity, along with a longer battery life (over two months opposed to the Kindle’s one month). Unfortunately, it’s also slightly heavier—7.48 ounces to the Kindle’s 5.98.

Though it did so with much less fanfare than Amazon, Canadian company Kobo also announced a sub-$100 e-reader on Thursday, the Kobo Mini, which launches in October. Coming in at $80, the Mini is a full inch smaller than either the Kindle or the Nook Simple Touch—Kobo claims you can stick it in a jeans pocket—and weighs a measly 4.73 ounces. Like the Nook, it too has a touchscreen, but far less battery life—only two weeks with Wi-Fi off. The Kobo supports more file types than the Nook or the Kindle, however, including popular CBZ and CBR comic book archive formats. The company’s $100 Kobo Touch is more comparable to the Nook Simple Touch: It features a 6-inch display, has one month of battery life, and weighs just 6.5 ounces.

Verdict: The low price certainly gives last year's Kindle an advantage—though if you want increased portability and more options for content, the Kobo Mini offers an intriguing option.

Amazon’s real Kindle star of the day was its new lit e-ink device, the Paperwhite. Starting at $119 (with special offers, $139 without), the Paperwhite boasts a much-improved touchscreen over its predecessor: 25 percent higher contrast, 212 pixels per inch, and a built-in light guide for nighttime reading. Amazon also boasts a two-month battery life—with the light on—for the 7.5-ounce Paperwhite. It ships October 1.

This puts Amazon head to head with Barnes and Noble’s currently-shipping $139 Nook Simple Touch with GlowLight. Though the GlowLight has a much poorer screen than the Paperwhite—only 800 x 600 to the Kindle’s 1024 x 768—and only one month of battery life with the light on, it’s lighter: just 6.95 ounces. The GlowLight also offers hardware page-turn buttons in addition to its touchscreen, a feature the Paperwhite sadly lacks.

Kobo, too, will have a lit e-reader come October: the $130 Kobo Glo. Its screen rivals the Paperwhite’s 1024 x 768 resolution, though its battery life with its light on is merely 55 hours. It also comes in several colors: black, pink, blue, and silver.

Neither Barnes and Noble nor Kobo have 3G-equipped readers, which leaves the high-end Paperwhite ($179 with ads, $199 without) on its own, competing only with an older version of Amazon’s Kindle—the $139 Kindle Keyboard 3G.

Verdict: Between the screen and Amazon’s battery life claims, the Paperwhite looks hard to beat.

Daniel Ionescu contributed the comparative chart to this article.

Posting comment ...


View the original article here