The impossibility of total vigilance against terrorism - opinion - 12 September 2012 - New Scientist@import "/css/gridmain.css"; @import "/css/article.css";@import "/css/comlist.css";@import "/data/images/ns/haas/haas.css";/* specific to this article view */#maincol {border-top:solid #A7A7A7 1px; padding-top:15px;}/* Basic commenting CSS*/.combx {margin:10px 0 0 0;padding:10px 20px 10px 10px;}#compnl {border-top:solid #A7A7A7 1px;}/* comment styles for article page only *//* form styles */#comform {margin:20px 50px 20px 10px;}#comform label{width: 90px;text-align: right;}#comform div.userhelp {margin:0 0 2px 115px;}#comform input.textinput, #comform textarea {width:300px;}#comform div.floatclear, #comformlogin div.floatclear {margin-bottom:10px;}#comform input#comcancel{margin:0 10px 0 0;}#comform input#compreview{margin:0 10px 0 0;}#comform textarea {height:95px;}#comformlogin {margin:20px 100px 20px 100px;}#comformlogin label{width: 120px;}#comformlogin input.textinput {width:150px;}#snv_opinion a {background: url('/img/bg/snv_opinion.jpg') no-repeat; color:#fff;}/* article social media */#sharebtns {width:440px; margin-left:10px; margin-bottom:20px; padding:15px 0 15px 10px; background:#F2F2F2;}#sharebtns div.floatleft {margin-right:10px;}#sharebtns .stumble {margin-top:1px;}.grpTools img {margin-right:8px; margin-top:9px;}#fblike {margin-top:41px;}
Opinion Log inEmailPassword Remember me
Your login is case sensitive
I have forgotten my password
Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens logincloseMy New ScientistHomeNewsIn-Depth ArticlesBlogsOpinionTVGalleriesTopic GuidesLast WordSubscribeDatingLook for Science JobsSPACETECHENVIRONMENTHEALTHLIFEPHYSICS&MATHSCIENCE IN SOCIETYCookies & Privacy
Home|Opinion|Tech|Opinion
The impossibility of total vigilance against terrorism12 September 2012Magazine issue 2882.
Subscribe and saveFor similar stories, visit the
Editorials,
Crime and Forensicsand
US national issuesTopic Guides AFTER the 9/11 attacks, the US government was understandably determined to do everything in its power to prevent a repeat. Within months the Department of Homeland Security opened for business, charged with protecting US citizens on home soil. In 2003, the department set up the BioWatch programme: networks of sensors in major urban areas to provide early warning of biological attacks. Almost a decade and a billion dollars down the road, BioWatch has drawn a complete blank - unless you count dozens of false alarms. It now looks like being scrapped if new sensing technology can't make it function as conceived (see "Detecting a subway bioterror attack"). If tests prove BioWatch can work, is it worth the expense? One argument is that no price is too high for vigilance against terrorism. The fact that BioWatch has not detected a single attack shows that the programme is doing its job. Maybe. But look at it another way. Since the US anthrax attacks of 2001 there has been no bioterrorism anywhere in the world. Unlike conventional explosives, germs pose a minuscule terror risk. Counterterrorism should remain a priority - but with a sense of perspective. Just because it is technologically possible to guard against a theoretical threat doesn't mean you should do it.
New ScientistNot just a website!Subscribe to New Scientist and get:New Scientist magazine delivered every weekUnlimited online access to articles from over 500 back issues
Subscribe Now and Save
If you would like
to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please
contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.Have your say
Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.
email:password:Remember me
Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article
Subscribe now to comment.
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.
ADVERTISEMENTMoreLatest newsA genetic blueprint of your unborn baby
10:00 08 September 2012
Sequencing the whole genome of a fetus could provide a medical early warning on a previously unknown scale - but it also brings dilemmas, says Harriet A. Washington
Feedback: Excessively polite signs
12:02 07 September 2012
Signs that apologise for their own existence, a return of "snow" to our TV screens, undrinkable alcohol, and more
Silent Spring didn't condemn millions to death11:24 06 September 2012
The 50-year-old campaign against Rachel Carson's book Silent Spring still distorts environmental debates, says William Souder
Hail Jeremy Hunt, the new minister for magic
10:47 05 September 2012
The UK government's new Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt is a supporter of homeopathy, a remedy more fitting of Hogwarts, says Andy Coghlan
see all related stories
MoreLatest newsToday on New Scientist: 12 September 201218:00 12 September 2012
All today's stories on newscientist.com, including: people addicted to addiction, Higgs extra, ocean-crossing Arctic foxes, narcosubs, and more
Discovery of first colour movies reveals animal stars 18:00 12 September 2012
Watch a vivid macaw and a goldfish star in the world's first colour films recently discovered in the UK
Deaf gerbils are all ears thanks to stem cells
18:00 12 September 2012
Stem cells injected into the ears of deaf gerbils successfully treat a form of hearing loss that affects one in 10 deaf people
How Facebook could help swing the US election
18:00 12 September 2012
A simple message at the top of someone's newsfeed is enough to make them vote – a handy tip for political campaign teams desperate to get the vote out in marginal seats
see all latest news
Most readMost commented Fiendish 'ABC proof' heralds new mathematical universe Why wood pulp is world's new wonder material Neutrinos – the next big small thing 13 things that do not make sense Metallic blue fruit shines brightest of all Most readMost commented Hail Jeremy Hunt, the new minister for magic Organic food: no better for you, or the planet If 2013 breaks heat record, how will deniers respond? Feedback: Excessively polite signs Neutrinos – the next big small thing TWITTERNew Scientist is on Twitter
Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed
LATEST JOBS Meet Recruitment: NEW CLIENT: Senior CRA– Hungary- Global Top 3 CRO - Great training and retention! SRG: QA and Regulatory Affairs Officer Paramount Recruitment: Business Development Leader - Medical Devices - London SLS Services: Health and Safety Manager Paramount Recruitment: Medical Equipment Sales Specialist - X-Ray - South West This week's issueSubscribe
For exclusive news and expert analysis, subscribe to New Scientist.
Gain full online accessCurrent issue contentContent of past issues15 September 2012ADVERTISEMENTBack to topLoginEmailPassword Remember me
Your login is case sensitive
I have forgotten my password
Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens logincloseAbout usNew ScientistSyndicationRecruitment AdvertisingStaff at New ScientistAdvertiseRBI JobsUser HelpContact UsFAQ / HelpDisclaimerTs & CsCookiesPrivacy PolicySubscriptionsSubscribeRenewGift subscriptionMy accountBack issuesCustomer ServiceLinksSite MapBrowse all articlesMagazine archiveNewScientistJobsThe LastWordRSS FeedsOnline StoreAndroid AppMobile site homeScience JobsBiology JobsChemistry JobsClinical JobsSales JobsEarth & Environment JobsEngineering JobsMaths & IT JobsGraduate Jobs© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.
View the original article here
