Thursday, November 8, 2012

Review: xTool iOBD2

Full OBD II diagnosticsWireless connectivitySlick smartphone appSome lag with live dataSimple code readers are cheaperMileage varies depending on model and age of car

Home-brew car diagnostics generally do two things. With a little knowledge, they can save you money on car maintenance. And they can also be a lot of fun.

It's the latter that the xTool iOBD2, a combination of hardware and app that supports iPhone and Android, majors on. That's not to say, however, it can't do the useful bit.

It's at least as powerful as most low cost on-board diagnostics readers, possibly more so. But it gets the job done in a much more user-friendly way and throws some extra features into the mix. Best of all, it connects wirelessly to your smartphone.

But let's not get ahead of ourselves. First a quick recap on what, exactly, digital car diagnostics involves.

It starts with the OBD II, or On Board Diagnostics Version 2, port. It's an industry-standard data port that provides an interface for pulling car diagnostics and error codes, among other info, in a common format.

OBD II was made mandatory in 1996 for all cars sold in the US. The European Union didn't follow suit until 2001. But the US stricture means most cars sold in the UK after 1996 have an OBD II port.

OBD II port

It's typically found somewhere under the dashboard. In our test car, a 1997 Porsche Boxster, the port is freely accessible without any dash disassembly, if slightly obscured. So a little neck craning aside, getting at it is no harder than, say, the USB port on the back of a tower PC.

A wide range of data can be pulled via iOBD2, from engine error codes to sensor data and current operating parameters like coolant temperature and road speed. Exactly what can and can't be read will depend both on your reading equipment and the make and model of car in question.

The OBD II port can also be used to program car ECUs, for instance resetting error codes. But that's another level of sophistication that doesn't apply to relatively straight forward readers like the xTool iOBD2.

Those familiar with OBD access will probably be used to either a standalone reader or something that plugs into a laptop. Either way, we're talking cables.

The xTool iOBD2's party trick is wireless operation. It's a compact unit, not much larger than the OBD port itself and slightly narrower than an iPhone in width.

xTool iOBD2

Once plugged in, it draws power from the OBD II and boots up a wi-fi access point. Having first installed the free xTool app on your handset, you then connect to the iOBD2's wireless access point, plug in some simple network settings and you're good to go.

The initial connection and syncing routine as you set up a profile for your car is a little sluggish. But from then on, it's quick to get going from a cold start

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

CDT to ITU: Promote Access and Openness, Don't Stifle It

If members of the International Telecommunications Union (ITU)—a UN agency known for its non-transparent, government-centric structure—vote to expand ITU authority to cover Internet policy and technical standards, Internet openness, affordability, and functionality could be at risk.

This shadow of uncertainty has propelled CDT’s recent advocacy ahead of the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) in December, where governments will update the agency’s treaty and decide whether or not the ITU should expand its authority to areas of Internet governance.

Today, CDT submitted comments to the Public Views and Opinions page of the ITU’s website, in which we state:

revisions to the ITU treaty should to strengthen the current communications environment, the need for the ITU to promote greater access to and the use of communications technologies; our fear that certain proposals might do the opposite. 

Since last spring, CDT has been working to galvanize civil society advocacy around the upcoming WCIT and analyzing leading treaty proposals that we fear could harm Internet openness, increase costs for users, and threaten the exercise of human rights online. We have consistently highlighted our concerns with the WCIT process, which is neither open to full participation by non-state actors, nor transparent to the public. 

In July 2012, the ITU Secretariat built the Public Views and Opinions page in response to calls from digital rights advocates to open the WCIT process to all actors who have a stake in the future of Internet governance. Any individual or group can use this page to submit comments for review by delegates and the public—but the ITU Secretariat has made no promises on how these comments will (or will not) be incorporated into decision-making at the WCIT.

Although the details remain murky, we have the impression that the Secretariat will not include public comments in the official record of the conference unless governments agree that they should do so. Delegations from all countries should vote to include these comments in the official record of the WCIT. 

Whether or not comments make it onto the official record, we also strongly urge both government and civil society members of national delegations to review and incorporate these comments into their own testimony at the WCIT. Civil society groups interested in submitting their own comments for the WCIT should visit CDT’s ITU Resource Center, where we have compiled analyses of treaty proposals, critiques of the WCIT process, and a range of tools for advocates working on this issue.


View the original article here

Review: KingSpec Multi Core 1TB PCIe

For mechanical hard drives the SATA 6Gbps interface is future-proofed for the foreseeable future, maybe even forever. When it comes to SSDs though, well, that's a different story. With the current crop of solid-state drives already knocking very hard on the door of the interface's bandwidth limit, we might have to start looking elsewhere for speedy SSDs.

While the world patiently awaits the arrival of SATA Express, some companies have locked their R&D engineers away in darkened rooms to come up with alternatives. Probably the best known of these alternatives is OCZ's RevoDrive and RevoDrive X2 series. Both use the PCIe x4 interface of a motherboard, but there's also the enterprise segment VeloDrive, which uses an x8 PCIe interface.

Now there's a new player on the block and with the MultiCore series, KingSpec isn't messing around. You can probably tell that from the price tag of the MultiCore 1TB we're looking at, as well as those quoted performance figures from a drive that taps into a PCIe 8x interface. There's also a 2TB version out there costing - you may want to sit down for this - £3,204.

It's not only the price tag of the MultiCore 1TB that's eye opening, the specifications do a pretty good job of that too.

To reach its 1TB capacity the drive uses eight of KingSpec's own 120GB mSATA SSD's mounted on the PCB. Each has its own last-gen SandForce SF-1222 controller too. The mSATA drives use NAND flash from a company whose name is more associated with graphics card memory, namely SK-Hynix.

Each drive uses four 32GB 25nm MLC modules to give its capacity. All the drives are configured in a RAID 0 array controlled by an LSI SAS2008 controller, which sits under a heatsink at one end of the PCB.

KingSpec has made setting up this SSD as a Windows boot drive as easy as it gets; just stick it an appropriate slot and off you go - there's no need for extra drivers as with some PCIe-based drives.

There is a fly in the ointment however, and that is that the boot time of the PC is raised quite significantly because of the extra BIOS page and commands that the card uses while it's booting up the system.

Sequential read performance
AS SSD: Megabytes per second: Bigger is better

KINGSPEC MULTICORE 1TB: 1475
OCZ REVODRIVE 3 X2 480GB: 767

Sequential write performance
AS SSD: Megabytes per second: Bigger is better

KINGSPEC MULTICORE 1TB: 370
OCZ REVODRIVE 3 X2 480GB: 475

4K random write performance
AS SSD: Megabytes per second: Bigger is better

KINGSPEC MULTICORE 1TB: 53
OCZ REVODRIVE 3 X2 480GB: 69

Under test conditions the drive out-shone KingSpec's own figures for reads, hitting 2,150MB/s in the ATTO benchmark, but the write of 1,855MB/s is a little way short of the quoted 2GB/s. It suffers though from the SandForce Achilles heel of incompressible data, particularly with this older version of its silicon. The incompressible sequential write figure drops to just 370MB/s when you run the test through the AS SSD benchmark.

The problem is compounded by the MultiCore using the first generation of controllers, as shown by the results compared to the OCZ RevoDrive 3 X2. That PCIe SSD uses the more up-to-date SF-2281 controller.

But benchmarks are all well and good - how does it work in real life? Well, copying a 100GB file from one folder on the drive to another took a mere 7 minutes compared to the 10 minutes of a high performance 480GB standard SSD.

Yes, it's blisteringly fast and eye-wateringly expensive but you have to ask yourself just how fast it could go if it had the latest controllers on the individual drives, and if those same drives used Toggle NAND. But if you crave a vast amount of lightning-fast storage - that's easy to use - you'd be hard pushed to look past this beast.


View the original article here

Review: Logitech UE Boombox

Solid build qualityVery good soundBattery lifeQuite large and heavyMid-range is slightly muffled, but not badly

We've really been looking forward to getting our hands on the UE Boombox - Logitech's latest and greatest portable Bluetooth speaker.

The Ultimate Ears range is the Very Serious part of Logitech's audio catalogue, offering high-end audio and premium build quality. The UE Boombox is no different in this regard - the first time you see it, it's hard to avoid grabbing it to admire.

The handle is a solid piece of aluminium running from one end of the Boombox to the other and going around the edges of the end panels. These panels are blue with some controls on, and are concave, so that the buttons are hidden when you look at it from the front. It's an Apple-level attention to detail.

The only problem is that we're not totally convinced by its looks. As we say, it really gets you at first, but you could consider it to be too flashy. It stands out as being a speaker, lacking the subtlety of something like Logitech's own UE Air Speaker or the statement of the B&W Zeppelin Air. It's kind of in the middle - it looks too much like a 'boombox' - in the '80s sense of the word - to sit in your house.

It needs to be carried around. Which is exactly what Logitech intends, of course, having included a battery that should be good for six hours of playback. Again, though, there's a bit of form over function here. The aluminium carry handle and other premium materials might feel great, but they're not light, and it's also not a small speaker.

But all that weight and cost isn't for nothing; living up to its UE name, this speaker sounds excellent. What will get you right out of the box is the bass - for a portable speaker, there is some serious low-end power here. It's rich and deep, giving you not just the initial punch of bass, but the full resonating force behind it - so much so that it can feel like a little bit of the finer detail is being lost in the bombast.

At the top end, it's brilliantly clear without getting shrill at any point. It doesn't quite have the depth of speakers that cost a few hundred pounds more, but that's because they cost a few hundred pounds more. This is full of detail and crispness, picking out every note clearly.

The mid-range is perhaps the only slightly weak area - it feels like the sparky top end and rumbling bass conspire to overshadowing it somewhat. Again, it's not really missing a beat, but we felt like it needed a little more of its own depth.

Ultimately, the most important thing you need to know is that the Logitech UE Boombox's sound quality is within touching distance of the Bowers & Wilkins Zeppelin Air. Yes, the £500 one. Put them in a head-to-head showdown and there's no doubt the Zeppelin Air is nicer overall, but the fact that it's a competition at all with a £200 speaker is a testament the UE Boombox's quality.

£200 might be a lot of money to spend for a portable speaker, but it's a damn good price for this level of audio and build quality. If only it supported AirPlay too!

Ads with Eyes Get a Closer Look

Facial recognition technology is both increasingly useful and increasingly problematic. The technology is widely available and easy to use. It is being applied to photo tagging, to targeting advertisements in stores, and to computer security and authentication. Facial recognition once required access to large databases of photographs and significant computing power available only to large corporations and governments. Today it is available in free software packages and in the handheld computing devices that millions of us use every day.

This week the Federal Trade Commission released, "Facing Facts: Best Practices for Common Uses of Facial Recognition Technologies," a report aimed at the growing number of companies using the technology.  The report is intended to a guidebook for developers on how to better protect consumer privacy as they build new products and services designed around facial recognition technology. Ahead of the FTC report, CDT released its own report on facial recognition that compares how the U.S. and E.U. treat the technology with respect to the law and policy making.
Throughout the report, the FTC cites the comments CDT submitted in December, 2011.   We feel that the guidance here from FTC is timely and reflects a measured balance with respect to consumer privacy without impeding the amazing innovation the facial recognition market is developing and deploying.

We echo the FTC in highlighting the importance of protecting the consumer with a three-level, conceptual approach to the use of facial recognition technologies:

•    Level 1: Counting: Facial information is detected but not used to tailor advertisements and no information is retained or linked to other sources of data.
•    Level 2: Targeting: Facial information is detected and used to tailor advertisements — demographics like age, ethnicity, etc. — and no information is retained or linked to other sources of data.
•    Level 3: Identification: Facial information is detected, used to tailor advertisements and also linked to an individual's identity or piece of property.

The privacy concerns escalate moving from level one to level three.  We believe technologies at level 1 or 2 should provide consumers with a conspicuous notice that facial recognition technology is in use, but not require an explicit "opt-out" because there is nothing to opt-out of given no link to identity.

Level 2 technologies should be mindful of sensitive populations like small children and turn advertising off or display a privacy policy when a child is looking at the screen. Similarly, we feel that level 3 technologies shouldn't be allowed in places people can't avoid, such as health care facilities and government services facilities.  Level 3 technologies should also give consumers the option to opt-out of such collection and that any transfer of facial information should require explicit and informed consent.

To their credit, many businesses are already mindful of privacy issues associated with facial recognition and have taken steps to reduce its impact on consumer privacy.

While these self-regulatory steps are important, industry standards today do not encompass the full range of commercial applications for facial recognition.  There is no "one size fits all" solution for the privacy concerns raised by this technology. Moreover, given the numerous other ways to identify and track consumers using biometric information, it's doubtful that any solution targeting facial recognition is even appropriate. Instead, a mix of policy and technical approaches will be needed to give consumers a greater measure of control over how facial recognition is used without unduly limiting its benefits.

CDT recently presented its own facial recognition paper at the 2012 Amsterdam Privacy Conference discussing the problems posed by facial recognition, the responses from industry in terms of self-regulation, the state of law and policy in both the United States and the European Union, and recommendations that we feel will help the marketing industry better respond to privacy concerns given the increasing use of facial recognition.


View the original article here

Review: Samsung UE46ES6300

Freesat HD and Freeview HDITV Player app3D & 2D Blu-raySmooth motionUnderpowered Smart HubNarrow viewing angleApps needs customisingAverage contrast

Lusting after flatscreen TVs is nothing new, but Edge LED TVs such as the Samsung 9000 Series, the Philips 9000 Series and Sony's HX853 Series, and the luscious Panasonic VT50 Series of plasmas, are beyond the reach of most of us. However, if you're after smart TV with Full HD resolution and 3D compatibility, you could do worse than take a step or two down the ladder of Samsung's Edge LED TVs until you arrive at the Samsung UE46ES6300.

A 46-inch Edge LED TV, the Samsung UE46ES6300's slim bezel of merely 12mm (0.5 inches) squeezes in both Freesat HD and Freeview HD TV tuners. Smart TV is delivered via Wi-Fi and includes apps exclusive to Samsung, the star of which is the ITV Player.

Samsung UE46ES6300 review

Design-wise, the Samsung UE46ES6300 features a clear plastic rim that adds another 8mm (0.3 inches) or so to the width of that bezel, although that transparent edge increases to just over a centimetre on the undercarriage, with a panel depth of 46.9mm (1.8 inches) par for the course at this price.

There are other hints that the UE46ES6300 is not Samsung's poshest effort, priced as it is at £1,149.99 (around AU$1,778/US$1,844). Its 200Hz Clear Motion Rate puts it a rung below the Samsung ES6800 Series, and there's no sign of a touchpanel remote or any voice/gesture controls, either, though we didn't expect any of that on a TV of that price.

Samsung UE46ES6300 review

We're just happy that two pairs of active shutter 3D glasses are supplied, even more so because they're the SSG-4100GB model, Samsung's own watch battery-powered specs that come flat-packed. Each slender - and suspiciously snap-able - arm has to be slotted into the lens surround, though we're hardly in Airfix territory.

They weigh an astonishing 107g (236lbs) and claim to work for 150 hours (though rechargeable models are also available that run for two hours on just a minute's charging in one of the Samsung UE46ES6300's USB slots).

Samsung UE46ES6300 review

Built around Samsung's X10+ chassis, the Samsung UE46ES6300 is not a dual core TV, and nor is there any of the micro dimming tech that we've appreciated on Samsung's higher-end TVs.

What the Samsung UE46ES6300 does have is SoundShare, which uses its Bluetooth 3.0. skills to wirelessly link up to a Samsung-made sound dock, such as the DA-750, which we were supplied with for this review.

Samsung UE46ES6300 review

It's a neat, though expensive (at around £550) way of increasing the audio prowess of flatscreen TVs, which regularly disappoint.

Samsung's 6300 Series is about as extensive as it gets in the flat TV market. First up in the range is the 32-inch UE32ES6300 and the 37-inch UE37ES6300, which go for £649.99 and £799.99 respectively, though neither of these small screen sets are 3D-ready.

Only at the 40-inch size do we get 3D glasses (two of them) - the 40-inch UE40ES6300 sells for £879.99, while up the pecking order from our review sample are the 50-inch UE50ES6300 (£1,299), 55-inch UE55ES6300 (£1,599.99) and the mammoth 60-inch UE60ES6300 (£2,499.99).

However, it's worth checking out the latest prices; although it has a list price of £1,150, we found the Samsung UE46ES6300 online for a paltry £849, which is about right in our judgement.

Hands-on review: Updated: HTC Windows Phone 8S

Update: We had more hands-on time and got to dive into the OS at the Windows Phone 8 event in San Francisco – here are some further thoughts from U.S. Associate Reviews Editor Alex Roth.

HTC has doubled down on Windows Phone 8, creating two colorful handsets, the compact HTC Windows Phone 8S and the more powerful HTC Windows Phone 8X. Both devices are available in four colors that help them stand out from the smartphone pack, although consumers might confuse them with the also splashy Nokia Lumia 920.

We've already reviewed the HTC Windows Phone 8X and found it to be a slightly mixed bag that's more good than not. Now, at the Windows Phone 8 launch event in San Francisco, we took a hands-on look at the 8S, just weeks ahead of its rumored November release date.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

Other than perhaps those distinctive Windows 8 Live Tiles, the first thing you'll notice about the HTC Windows Phone 8S are those bold colors it's available in. Gray, black, red and blue are the four primary colors on offer.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

Unlike the 8X, which comes in a single solid color, the 8S has a two-tone look. The bottom of the phone's face and the rear cover each sport a lighter hue. Red is met by orange and blue by a lighter blue. Black has a white stripe, giving it an Oreo cookie look, and gray with lime green, which comes of a bit like a crossing guard's vest.

Holding the 8S, we were struck by its feel in more ways than one. Its polycarbonate construction has a distinctly rubbery feel. It's grippy and honestly fun to hold. There's an unmistakably plastic feel, but not the flimsiness you'd find with a budget phone.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

That rubbery quality is a nice touch, but did have us worrying that it might pick up lint in our pocket and make the 8S lose some of its trademark luster.

The phone's Gorilla Glass face, rounded backside and highly tapered edges give it a sleek appearance. This makes the feel of its easy-to-hold rubberized body all the more surprising.

The Windows Phone 8S by HTC has good specs for what will likely be a moderately priced device. While we don't have a firm word on costs yet, it will undoubtedly go for less than the 8X, which is $560 as a full priced, no contract device.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

In the processor department it has a very standard 1GHz dual-core Snapdragon processor. The display is a rather sharp 4-inch, 720p screen. For memory there's 1GB of RAM and 4GB of onboard storage, with room for an additional 32GB via microSD expansion. That actually puts it above the 8X, which is stuck at 16GB of space thanks to its lack of expandable memory support.

As with the 8X, the Windows Phone 8S's lock button is found on top of the phone. Depending on what sort of device you've grown accustom to, this placement may take some getting used to.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

There's a volume rocker on the right side with the standard issue Windows Phone 8 dedicated camera button below it.

That two-tone space on the rear is actually a pop-off panel, allowing you access to a microSD slot. Again, the 8X lacks such a feature, and the 8S is only a tiny bit thicker for having a more open design. It's 0.41-inches (10.3-mm) thick, as opposed to 0.40-inches (10.1-mm).

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

This small, removable panel is easy to slide off thanks to the phone's rubberized build. While the lack of removable battery will disappoint some consumers (the cell is only 1700 mAh, after all), the miniature hatch design is yet another distinct design decision for the Windows Phone 8S.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

In addition to what Windows Phone 8 offers, HTC has contributed some software of its own. Its Live Tile behaves like an Android widget, displaying a forecast, temperature and the time at a glance.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

Jumping into the app gives further information on those subjects as well as stocks.

HTC Windows Phone 8S

In settings you'll find Attentive Phone, which has a selection of intuitive ringer options. The Windows Phone 8S can be set to ring louder when tucked away in a pocket or purse, automatically quiet down or shut up altogether when you pick it up or turn it over.

HTC Windows Phone 8S

Like all devices running Windows Phone 8, HTC's 8S has a dedicated camera button. Pushing it opens up the 5-megapixel camera, which can also shoot 720p video.

HTC Windows Phone 8S

If you feel like slapping some Instagram-style post-production on your snaps, HTC has included its own Photo Enhancer app. It has a number of filters to choose from, including the all-popular vintage style.

Alas, this is not a phone for video chat fans as it lacks a front-facing camera.

The Windows Phone 8S has surprisingly good external speakers. We were able to crank pre-loaded tracks to a high a volume without getting distorted, crunchy sound. While any music aficionado would surely use headphones, a representative reminded us that these speakers benefit the speakerphone function as well.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

As the familiar "B" logo suggests, there's Beats by Dre branding here, which likely plays into the strong audio output. However, the 8S does not boast the volume-boosting amplifiers of its big brother the 8X.

If we had a to pick a favorite aspect of the Windows Phone 8S by HTC, it would have to been its overall look. Between the iPhone 5, Galaxy S3 and Droid Razr M, we live in a sea of polished aluminum. In the past, we've claimed to prefer its feel, but HTC's 8X and 8S have proven that a little aesthetic variety is indeed nice.

It's a compact phone that's still got reputable specs, and the option for microSD expansion is an unexpected plus, given the 8X's completely sealed design.

We do wonder what its battery life will be like with a 1700 mAh cell, and the lack of front-facing camera is rather strange. A special version of Skype has been one of Mictosoft's major bragging points with Windows Phone 8, and it seems the 8S won't be able to enjoy all the benefits. This could be a corner that was cut to make a highly affordable device, making us all the more eager to get firm pricing numbers, and equally eager to give the 8S a full-blown review.

Below is our original and early hands-on look at the Windows Phone 8S by HTC.

TechRadar got early access to the Windows Phone 8S by HTC, and while we admired it's aesthetic merits, it wasn't running a finished version of the OS – we will be updating this review soon as we get hands on with the finished product at HTC's event in New York.

The Windows Phone 8S by HTC, which is its proper title don't ya know, launched alongside the HTC 8X at a special HTC event in New York, where the Taiwanese firm unveiled its first Windows Phone 8 handsets.

Both, we're told, will go on sale in early November and the Windows Phone 8S will be available in a range of two-tone colour options; California Blue, Graphite Black, Flame Red and Limelight Yellow – the latter being the one we've laid our hands on.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

The HTC Windows Phone 8S price is currently un-known, but as this is clearly a mid-range handset we expect it to rival the likes of the HTC One V and Sony Xperia U.

Design wise the 8S can be compared to the One V and Xperia U, with a separate chunk below the screen – although it stays flush with the device instead of curving forwards as on the V.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

Like the Windows Phone 8X, the HTC 8S isn't the slimmest handset at 10.3mm, but the taped edges provide the illusion that it is thinner than it is, and the tidy 120.5 x 63mm frame gives a sleek finish to decent looking device.

The Windows Phone 8S sits comfortably in the hand and at 113g it's nicely weighted without feeling like a cheap toy.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

The 4-inch, WVGA (800 x 480) display dominates the majority of a relatively minimalist front, which also features the Windows, back and search soft keys on the colour bar below and the matching earpiece above.

There's a power/lock key and 3.5mm headphone jack sitting on top of the 8S, while a volume rocker switch and camera button reside on the right hand side of the handset.

The buttons are easy to hit, and thanks to the small stature of the HTC 8S you don't need to stretch your fingers to far to reach any part of the handset.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

A microUSB port is found on the base of the Windows Phone 8S, and you can slide the rear of the coloured section off to reveal a microSIM slot and a microSD slot – allowing you to build on the 4GB of internal memory.

There's no access to the 1,700mAh battery though, which may annoy some of you who like to stick bigger power packs in your phones, but it should keep you going for a whole day with a decent level of usage.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

We'd expect the 1GHz dual-core S4 processor and 512MB RAM to run Windows Phone 8 without too much of a fuss, however as we were only able to access the lock and home screens on the HTC 8S, you'll have to wait for our updated hands on review to find out how it gets on.

That said, the display was still clear, and although not as pin-sharp or vibrant as on its bigger brother the Windows Phone 8X, it's still a perfectible acceptable for what we expect to be an affordable smartphone.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

Round the back there's a 5MP camera, with single LED flash and 720p video recording, and HTC has ensured it comes with a f/2.8 aperture and 35mm lens for improved picture quality.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

It's good to see the dedicated physical shutter button on the side of the 8S, allowing you to launch the camera app and snap photos easily – something we find easier than trying to tap the onscreen alternative.

As we mentioned at the start, we'll update this review later today with our findings from the fully working version of the Windows Phone 8S by HTC, after we've spent some time with it at the event.

HTC Windows Phone 8S review

It's obviously difficult to give a proper early verdict at this point, but once we've had a play with the final device today, we'll update this with a more informed outlook.

Design wise we reckon the Taiwanese firm is on to a winner with the HTC Windows Phone 8S, but we'll reserve proper judgement until we've spent some time with the fully working device in New York.


View the original article here