Monday, September 17, 2012

Detecting a subway bioterror attack

Detecting a subway bioterror attack - tech - 12 September 2012 - New Scientist@import "/css/gridmain.css"; @import "/css/article.css";@import "/css/comlist.css";@import "/data/images/ns/haas/haas.css";/* specific to this article view */#maincol {border-top:solid #A7A7A7 1px; padding-top:15px;}/* Basic commenting CSS*/.combx {margin:10px 0 0 0;padding:10px 20px 10px 10px;}#compnl {border-top:solid #A7A7A7 1px;}/* comment styles for article page only *//* form styles */#comform {margin:20px 50px 20px 10px;}#comform label{width: 90px;text-align: right;}#comform div.userhelp {margin:0 0 2px 115px;}#comform input.textinput, #comform textarea {width:300px;}#comform div.floatclear, #comformlogin div.floatclear {margin-bottom:10px;}#comform input#comcancel{margin:0 10px 0 0;}#comform input#compreview{margin:0 10px 0 0;}#comform textarea {height:95px;}#comformlogin {margin:20px 100px 20px 100px;}#comformlogin label{width: 120px;}#comformlogin input.textinput {width:150px;}#snv_tech a {background: url('/img/bg/snv_tech.jpg') no-repeat; color:#fff;}/* article social media */#sharebtns {width:440px; margin-left:10px; margin-bottom:20px; padding:15px 0 15px 10px; background:#F2F2F2;}#sharebtns div.floatleft {margin-right:10px;}#sharebtns .stumble {margin-top:1px;}.grpTools img {margin-right:8px; margin-top:9px;}#fblike {margin-top:41px;} Subscribe nowNew ScientistTech    Log in

EmailPassword Remember me

Your login is case sensitive

I have forgotten my password

Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens loginclose

My New ScientistHomeNewsIn-Depth ArticlesBlogsOpinionTVGalleriesTopic GuidesLast WordSubscribeDatingLook for Science JobsSPACETECHENVIRONMENTHEALTHLIFEPHYSICS&MATHSCIENCE IN SOCIETYCookies & Privacy

Home|Tech|Health|News

Detecting a subway bioterror attack12 September 2012 byHal Hodson, Greater BostonMagazine issue 2882. Subscribe and saveFor similar stories, visit theMicro-organisms, Crime and Forensicsand US national issuesTopic Guides

Late at night in the Boston area subway system, researchers release a cloud of bacteria into the tunnel…

Editorial: "The impossibility of total vigilance against terrorism"

IT'S 3 am, and the subway station has long since shut for the night. As I watch, a small group of people move along the platform in the eerie quiet, their anticipation palpable as they prepare to release a cloud of bacteria into the tunnels beneath the densely populated Boston area.

Among them is a woman holding an array of translucent green nozzles, ready to release the agent. Her radio crackles to life: "The train has just left; we're a go."

Anne Hultgren isn't a terrorist: in her hands she holds a batch of dead Bacillus subtilis bacteria which, when dispersed, will form nothing more than a harmless cloud. It's all part of an experiment by Hultgren's employer, the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Her team is testing whether its new detection equipment could work as an early warning system if a deadly agent like anthrax was released into a city's metro network.

The faint rumble of the inbound train gets louder, and Hultgren starts spraying. Almost immediately, the cloud begins to waft through the tunnel towards downtown Boston, pushed by a column of air in front of the train.

As the train pulls in to the station we watch and wait to see if the sensors at the next stop down the line will detect the bacteria.

At our station, several bulky grey sensor boxes called triggers are slung on metal racks at four points along the platform. The triggers were installed around a year ago and since then have been measuring background levels of biological material - one of the keys to avoiding the false positives that have dogged previous biosensing systems. Hultgren can't go into detail about the technology inside, but similar commercially available systems count biological particles as they pass through a beam of light inside the box.

Anything over the background level will send a signal that activates a bright red box at the end of the station. Hultgren calls it a confirmer, and says it is the real novel technology in this test.

Hultgren and her team were brought in to improve the beleaguered BioWatch programme (see "Crying wolf on terrorism"), and the confirmer is the result. She says that her team has miniaturised the equipment needed for a process commonly used to identify DNA, called the polymerase chain reaction.

"Previous biodetection programs relied on continuous daily testing," Hultgren says. "Air filters would be collected every day by hand, and brought to a lab for analysis."

That lab analysis has now been engineered into a suitcase-sized box, and happens on site whenever the triggers detect unusual quantities of a biological agent. "We are aiming to do in 20 minutes what used to take two days," Hultgren says.

A few days after the test, Hultgren tells me the system worked as planned, both detecting and identifying the bacteria. "The confirmer collected a sample and about 30 minutes after the release we had a positive detection of the material at a station over a mile away down the track," she says.

The tests will continue for five months, helping the DHS understand how biological agents move around the subway when the weather is colder, for instance.

Janet-Martha Blatny, who runs a similar biosensing project for the European Commission, says that tests like this are crucial to improving biodetection systems.

"Trials resembling real-life conditions have been lacking and are one of the major causes explaining the high rate of false alarms of current biodetectors," Blatny says.

Crying wolf on terrorism

In the wake of 9/11, letters laced with anthrax bacteria began showing up, delivered through the US postal system. Five people died in the attacks. In response, the government launched an anti-bioterror programme in 2003 called BioWatch.

BioWatch has sensing systems in major cities across the country. Since its deployment, it has been plagued by false alarms and has never spotted an instance of terrorism. Lawmakers have grown critical that the $1-billion programme risks desensitising officials, who may not react if the system detects a real attack.

Congress is currently deciding whether to spend an extra $3.1 billion over the next five years to keep the programme going.

Issue 2882 of New Scientist magazineSubscribe to New Scientist and you'll get:New Scientist magazine delivered every weekUnlimited access to all New Scientist online content -
a benefit only available to subscribersGreat savings from the normal priceSubscribe now!printsendIf you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say

Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.

email:password:Remember me  

Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article

Subscribe now to comment.

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

printsendSomething in the air? <i>(Image: Brian Feulner)</i>Something in the air? (Image: Brian Feulner)

ADVERTISEMENT

MoreLatest newsHow Facebook could help swing the US election18:00 12 September 2012

A simple message at the top of someone's newsfeed is enough to make them vote – a handy tip for political campaign teams desperate to get the vote out in marginal seats

Water-repellent balls make liquid boil with no bubbles18:00 12 September 2012

Steel spheres coated with nanoparticles can keep water smooth and calm even when boiling, which could reduce the risk of industrial explosions

The impossibility of total vigilance against terrorism16:36 12 September 2012

Some terrorist threats are too small to spend billions on watching out for them

Unsure robots make better teachers than know-alls11:00 08 September 2012

Students learn best from a robot when it makes mistakes that they can correct

see all related stories

MoreLatest newsToday on New Scientist: 12 September 201218:00 12 September 2012

All today's stories on newscientist.com, including: people addicted to addiction, Higgs extra, ocean-crossing Arctic foxes, narcosubs, and more

Discovery of first colour movies reveals animal stars 18:00 12 September 2012

Watch a vivid macaw and a goldfish star in the world's first colour films recently discovered in the UK

Deaf gerbils are all ears thanks to stem cells18:00 12 September 2012

Stem cells injected into the ears of deaf gerbils successfully treat a form of hearing loss that affects one in 10 deaf people

How Facebook could help swing the US election18:00 12 September 2012

A simple message at the top of someone's newsfeed is enough to make them vote – a handy tip for political campaign teams desperate to get the vote out in marginal seats

see all latest news

Most readMost commented Fiendish 'ABC proof' heralds new mathematical universe Why wood pulp is world's new wonder material Neutrinos – the next big small thing 13 things that do not make sense Metallic blue fruit shines brightest of all Most readMost commented Hail Jeremy Hunt, the new minister for magic Organic food: no better for you, or the planet If 2013 breaks heat record, how will deniers respond? Feedback: Excessively polite signs Neutrinos – the next big small thing TWITTERNew Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

LATEST JOBS Meet Recruitment: NEW CLIENT: Senior CRA– Hungary- Global Top 3 CRO - Great training and retention! SRG: QA and Regulatory Affairs Officer Paramount Recruitment: Business Development Leader - Medical Devices - London SLS Services: Health and Safety Manager Paramount Recruitment: Medical Equipment Sales Specialist - X-Ray - South West This week's issueSubscribe

Cover of latest issue of New Scientist magazine

For exclusive news and expert analysis, subscribe to New Scientist.

Gain full online accessCurrent issue contentContent of past issues15 September 2012

ADVERTISEMENT

Back to top

Login

EmailPassword Remember me

Your login is case sensitive

I have forgotten my password

Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens loginclose

About usNew ScientistSyndicationRecruitment AdvertisingStaff at New ScientistAdvertiseRBI JobsUser HelpContact UsFAQ / HelpDisclaimerTs & CsCookiesPrivacy PolicySubscriptionsSubscribeRenewGift subscriptionMy accountBack issuesCustomer ServiceLinksSite MapBrowse all articlesMagazine archiveNewScientistJobsThe LastWordRSS FeedsOnline StoreAndroid AppMobile site homeScience JobsBiology JobsChemistry JobsClinical JobsSales JobsEarth & Environment JobsEngineering JobsMaths & IT JobsGraduate Jobs© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.

View the original article here

No comments:

Post a Comment