Tech Log inEmailPassword Remember meYour login is case sensitive
I have forgotten my password
Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens logincloseMy New ScientistHomeNewsIn-Depth ArticlesBlogsOpinionTVGalleriesTopic GuidesLast WordSubscribeDatingLook for Science JobsSPACETECHENVIRONMENTHEALTHLIFEPHYSICS&MATHSCIENCE IN SOCIETYCookies & PrivacyHome|Tech|Environment|News
Waste water harnessed to make electricity and plastics03 September 2012 byHal Hodsonand Hannah KrakauerMagazine issue 2880. Subscribe and saveFor similar stories, visit theEnergy and FuelsTopic GuideThe treatment of waste water can be used to create energy and biodegradable plastics
TREATING waste water is energy intensive. In the US, it sucks up the equivalent output of four of the country's biggest power plants every year. But it needn't be such a drain on resources - soon it might be able to earn its keep. A team led by Hong Liu from Oregon State University in Corvallis has plans for microbial fuel cells that will reclaim energy from waste water and produce around 2.87 watts per litre of waste water. That is almost double the amount of electrical power usual for such a cell. And its by-products could be harnessed to create cheap, biodegradable plastics. Waste water holds huge amounts of energy, bound up in organic molecules, but it can be difficult to access. The Oregon fuel cells run on microbes that would normally digest organic matter to produce water. In a fuel cell, though, isolated from oxygen, that conversion stalls and electrons, which are bundled with protons and oxygen to form water, are pulled away from the microbes by the potential between a cathode and an anode, creating an electrical current. As well as tweaking the mixture of microbes on the electrodes, the Oregon design has also managed to squash far more electrodes into the fuel cell than on previous versions. Liu says her lab aims to scale up the device within the next five years and make it cheaper (Energy & Environmental Science, doi.org/h66). The by-products of waste water treatment can be harnessed too. Engineers are working on a way to convert methane into biodegradable plastics. The dream plastic would be biodegradable, made from organic materials, and break down easily. At the moment, polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) seems like the best bet. But PHA plastics are manufactured by genetically modified bacteria fed on sugars in a process that is both expensive and complex, making it hard for them to compete with conventional plastics. In the past, researchers have used the by-products of waste water treatment to generate fuel and sometimes even to create plastics, but nearly all these attempts have focused on the "sludge" of sediment, solid waste and chemicals. Because the sludge is made of many diverse components, it produces a less stable plastic. So Molly Morse of Mango Materials in California and colleagues are now using methane, another major by-product of treating waste water. Methanotrophs, simple organisms that feed on methane, are much better at converting it into polymers than typical bacteria are at converting sugar into plastics. Methane is pumped into a vat of methanotrophs - harvested from the waste water treatment plant itself - along with a bubbling stream of oxygen and a few other nutrients. The end result is a polymer powder that can be separated from the mass of bacteria and turned into pellets for shaping into commercial plastic products. Morse envisions that their waste water plastic could be used for all kinds of temporary or disposable applications, ranging from packaging materials to beauty products. Craig Criddle at Stanford University in California, who is on the firm's advisory board, says when methane itself is sold as fuel it first needs to be cleaned up. Then it will bank about 60 to 80 cents for 3 to 4 kilograms, whereas the same amount of methane could yield a kilogram of plastic, bringing in 4 to 5 dollars. "There's huge value added in going from biogas to plastic," he says. Pure, clean water from the sewerClean water itself is one of the products that can be gleaned from waste. In Singapore, clean water reclaimed from human sewage is sold as NEWater. The country, which has tended to rely on Malaysia for clean water, plans to produce half of the water it consumes through waste reclamation by 2060.
After conventional treatment, the waste water passes through a membrane with a very fine mesh to remove large particles before reverse osmosis draws out bacteria and other contaminants. It is then zapped with ultraviolet radiation to kill off any remaining bugs. It is mainly used for industrial applications in cooling but is also blended with reservoir water to be used as drinking water.
New ScientistNot just a website!Subscribe to New Scientist and get:New Scientist magazine delivered every weekUnlimited online access to articles from over 500 back issuesSubscribe Now and Save
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.Have your sayOnly subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.
email:password:Remember meOnly personal subscribers may leave comments on this article
Subscribe now to comment.
Can't Do BothThu Aug 30 16:30:21 BST 2012 by Eric KvaalenThe title and the beginning of the article seem to say that you can produce electricity and plastic from the same waste water. But if I understand it correctly, it's either or. The fuel cell uses the organic molecules to produce carbon dioxide and water, whereas the other idea is to produce methane from the organic molecules and then some sort of plastic from the methane. You can't do both with the same input.
It would be nice if the article told us what kind of plastic. I suppose it means the polyhydroxyalkanoates mentioned in connexion with bacteria. That would mean polymers like polylactide.
I can't help but wonder what life would be like if we had never introduced the modern sewage system in the first place-to me it is an obscenity to use potable water to dispose of human waste.There was a quite adequate waste disposal system in existence in some major European cities in the late 19th century which largely eliminated the need for waste water purification,and also provided fertilizer for farming.If you are interested,an excellent article on this subject can be found at: (long URL - click here)
login and replyreport this commentCan't Do BothMon Sep 03 17:04:51 BST 2012 by NurseMikeSandy the article you refer to states "The only way to get nutrients from sea to land is via marine bird droppings - which is of course in very short supply."
Clearly you have never lived Aberdeen!
The article states "will reclaim energy from waste water and will produce around 2.87 watts per litre of waste water". That actually means will produce about 2.87 joules of energy per litre of waste water per second. So how many seconds does it do this for ? This is the kind of silly nonsense journalists produce when they don't distinguish between power and energy. Without the correct units it is not possible to evaluate how much energy is likely to be produced.
login and replyreport this commentGet The Units CorrectMon Sep 03 19:42:45 BST 2012 by Eric KvaalenI at first thought that was a mistake and that they were mixing up power and energy, but in the end I decided that they really do mean watts per litre. The accomplishment is that the researchers have developed a system that has a relatively high output of power per unit volume of fuel cell. (The article should perhaps have said "per litre of fuel cell" rather than "per litre of waste water".)
I don't know how much energy they get per litre of waste water, but one could try to estimate it from the BOD of the sewage.
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.
Dirty work (Image: Roger Bamber/Alamy)ADVERTISEMENTMoreLatest newsUnsure robots make better teachers than know-alls
16:41 31 August 2012Students learn best from a robot when it makes mistakes that they can correct
Bendy battery lets you wear gadgets' power supply
11:08 30 August 2012Flexible battery design lets you wear your gadget's power source on the wrist, neck or any part of the body you fancy
Let's get lost: Apps that help you wander to happiness
08:00 30 August 2012From GPS to book recommendations, technology is eradicating uncertainty from life. But what if happiness depends on taking chances?
Visual programming means anyone can be a coder
10:00 29 August 2012Coding by tweaking on-screen shapes and drawings could revolutionise computer programming, making it accessible to all
see all related stories
MoreLatest newsMoon's magnetic umbrellas may shield future spaceships18:43 03 September 2012New insights into lunar anomalies could inspire deflector shields for spaceships that would protect astronauts against solar storms
Today on New Scientist: 3 September 201218:00 03 September 2012All today's stories on newscientist.com, including: stem cells return some feeling to paralysed patients, satellite images of Brazil's ravaged rainforests, the ultimate food scare, and more
Retracing the stardust trail17:34 03 September 2012In The Stardust Revolution, Jacob Berkowitz explains how stars have shaped the universe and asks if we may soon discover life outside the solar system
Brain diabetes: the ultimate food scare15:51 03 September 2012Big trouble lies ahead if Alzheimer's is proven to be a form of diabetes
see all latest news
Most readMost commented Epigenetics gives clues to human cancer susceptibility Two dead stars provide low-tech way to test Einstein Rosacea may be caused by mite faeces in your pores Mirrors take root in pitch-black nanotube forest Protein discovery could lead to 'genomic debuggers' Most readMost commented Fracking could be combined with carbon capture plans Rosacea may be caused by mite faeces in your pores Big burn theory: Why humans spontaneously combust
Bonobo genius makes stone tools like early humans did Food for thought: Eat your way to dementia TWITTERNew Scientist is on Twitter
Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed
LATEST JOBS PIC: Laboratory Technician SEC Recruitment: Senior Statistical Programmers | Perm | UK or Germany SEC Recruitment: Senior Lead Programmer |Germany |Global Company Meet Recruitment: Regulatory Affairs Publisher, Vienna Meet Recruitment: Fantastic Senior Regulatory Affairs function @ top Pharma, Berks/Bucks This week's issueSubscribe
For exclusive news and expert analysis, subscribe to New Scientist.
Gain full online accessCurrent issue contentContent of past issues01 September 2012ADVERTISEMENTBack to topLoginEmailPassword Remember meYour login is case sensitive
I have forgotten my password
Register nowActivate my subscriptionInstitutional loginAthens logincloseAbout usNew ScientistSyndicationRecruitment AdvertisingStaff at New ScientistAdvertiseRBI JobsUser HelpContact UsFAQ / HelpDisclaimerTs & CsCookiesPrivacy PolicySubscriptionsSubscribeRenewGift subscriptionMy accountBack issuesCustomer ServiceLinksSite MapBrowse all articlesMagazine archiveNewScientistJobsThe LastWordRSS FeedsOnline StoreAndroid AppMobile site homeScience JobsBiology JobsChemistry JobsClinical JobsSales JobsEarth & Environment JobsEngineering JobsMaths & IT JobsGraduate Jobs© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.
No comments:
Post a Comment